Conus
(Contraconus) tryoni (Heilprin, 1887)
Conus
(Contraconus) tryoni brantleyi (Petuch & Mardie Drolshagen, 2011)
Shell
sub-conical, sinistral, rather thin in substance; spire more elevated than in the typical
cones, of about eight or nine volutions, terminating in a prominent pointed
apex; whorls of the spire subangulated, or carinated
above the suture, the carination sharply but minutely crenulated on the first five or six whorls;
suture bordered inferiorly by a prominent raised
convex line, which is followed by from four to five less prominent (and occasionally quite obscure)
revolving lines on the shoulders of the whorls
(1).
Body-whorl
about four-fifths the length of the shell, gently convex, crossed for the greater
part of its extent by numerous obscure lines or composite bands, which become
conspicuous toward the base, and exhibit
there a distinct, although irregular, alternation of coarser and finer lines. Aperture somewhat arcuate, broadest
near the base; columellar surface
slightly folded basally ; outer lip thin ; sinual inflection a half-inch in
depth (1).
Length, five inches; greatest width, 2.3 inches.
Caloosahatchee,
in the banks below Fort Thompson.
This beautiful cone, by far the largest reversed
species of the genus with
which I am acquainted, can readily be distinguished from the only other sinistral form that
has thus far been described from the Tertiary deposits
of the Eastern United States, Conus adversaries, by its more ponderous proportions, the greater
relative elevation of the spire, and the
revolving lines on the shoulders of the whorls. These last are obscured through erosion in some
specimens, which then more nearly approach
the Miocene fossil. There appears to be a narrower form of this type, which possibly represents a
distinct species. It differs in the more
pronounced angulation of the body-whorl, the lesser relative width of the crown, and a more pronounced straight-sidedness in
the bounding lines of the
shell. The number of such specimens in our collection is not very great, and scarcely
sufficient to warrant a specific separation of the form from the species just
described (1).
Named after Geo. W. Tryon, Jr., the distinguished conchologist of the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia, from whom the author
has received much valuable assistance in the preparation of this and other paleontological papers (1).
Following Conrad’s (1840)
description of Conus adversarius, Heilprin (1887) described a second
fossil species of sinistral Conus, C. tryoni, from the banks of
theCaloosahatchee River, Florida. He differentiated this species from C.
adversarius on the basis of “its more ponderous proportions, the greater
relative elevation of the spire, and the revolving lines on the shoulders of
the whorls” (Heilprin, 1886: 82) (2).
Dall (1890: 26) designated C.
tryoni as a synonym of C. adversarius, noting that “C. Tryoni is
merely the fullgrown and most perfect form of C. adversarius.” (2)
Olsson & Harbison (1953: 171)
recognized C. tryoni as a subspecies of C. adversarius, and
assigned it to that rank on the basis of its higher stratigraphic position and
“sufficiently well-marked” characters (2).
In her unpublished master’s
thesis, Kamp (1967) regarded C. adversarius tryoni as an unnecessary
subspecies, and placed it in synonymy with C. adversarius (2).
Dall’s (1890) placement of Heilprin’s (1886) C. tryoni within C.
adversarius is accepted here for the reasons stated by Dall, and because
the distinguishing features noted by Heilprin (the variable characters of size,
height of the spire, and spiral threads on the shoulder whorls) are not
considered here to be taxonomically significant for sinistral cones, including
at the subspecific level (2).
|
|
|
Contraconus tryoni (1) Fig. 10 |
Contraconus
tryoni Museo Cortesi -
Castell’Arquato --------------- Edward Petuch: a classic Contraconus tryoni from the
Gelasian Age of the Early Pleistocene (an index fossil for the Fort
Denaud Member of the Caloosahatchee Formation). They often can
get very large, like this one. C. adversarius is an older species from the Piacenzian Age of the
Pliocene, found in the Pinecrest Member of the Tamiami Formation and also
the Yorktown and Duplin Formations. It is smaller than tryoni and has a
flatter spire and sharply-angled shoulder with a distinct sharp edge. C. mitchellorum is one of the last 2 Contraconus species
(the other is C. heilprini) and is confined to the Ayers Landing
Member of the Caloosahatchee Formation. It is a much more slender than tryoni,
has a higher and more protracted spire, and the spire whorls are heavily
ornamented with large beads and coronations; very different from tryoni.
So, the museum can change the
label to
|
|
|
||
Contraconus tryoni Fort Denaud Member,Calooshatchee Formation. Miami Canal Dig, Palm BeachCounty mm. 109,3 x 47,8 Collected by
E. Petuch (From
Giancarlo Paganelli 31/10/2022) [AZFC
158-01] |
|
mm. 124 Bee Branch Member, Caloosahatchee Formation |
|
|
|
mm. 124 Bee
Branch Member, Caloosahatchee Formation |
Contraconus
tryoni Fort Denaud Member Calooshatchee Formation Miami Canal Dig Palm BeachCounty mm. 109,3 x 47,8 Collected by
E. Petuch (From
Giancarlo Paganelli) (31/10/2022) [AZFC 158-01] |
Contraconus tryoni 83,5 x 35,5 mm. SouthBay [AZFC 158-00] |
Bibliografia Consultata