Conus
nisus (Orbigny, 1847)
In 1817, Dillwyn had already described Conus nisus,
but it was a Conus cinereus (Hwass in Bruguière, 1792), so the name was
available.
In 1835 Grateloup (3) described a fossil
specimen from Dax, which he misidentified as the estant Conus puncticulatus.
Realizing the error, Orbigny (1) redefined the figure of
Grateloup as Conus nisus.
In 1846, Kiener described another Conus nisus,
but due to the earlier definitions of Dillwyn and Orbigny, this species has
been redefined as Conus
amplus (Röckel & Korn, 1992).
|
|
Conus puncticulatus
mm. 27 x 17 Panama |
C. puncticulatus (Hwass in Bruguiere, 1792) Grateloup, 1835, pl. 2,fig.
16 (non Lamarck). Dax, chemin de Mandillot = Misidentificati C. puncticulatus Hwass
in Bruguiere, 1792 |
Bibliografia Consultata