Conus granularis (Borson, 1820)
Conus granuliferus (Grateloup, 1835)
Conus granularis var. stachey (Hoernes &
Auinger, 1879)
Conus stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879)
Conus granuliferus var.
opellus (Gregorio, 1885)
Conus granulifer (Peyrot, 1931)
Conus (Conasprella) minutissima (Harzhauser
& Landau, 2016)
Descrizione e caratteristiche:
Conchiglia
di piccole dimensioni. Questa
specie č frequente nel Miocene e ricorda alcuni Hemiconus eocenici come
l’Hemiconus defrancei e l’Hemiconus scabriculus. Il genere Hemiconus
č perň da considerare come caratteristico dell’Eocene (3).
Il Conus granularis taurolaevigata
(Sacco, 1893) č caratteristica dell’Elveziano.
Il Conus granularis dertosimplex
(Sacco, 1893) ha delle granulazioni che sembra che si possano individuare anche
nell’esemplare illustrato.
Il Conus granuliferus
(Grateloup, 1835) č da considerare una varietŕ del Conus granularis.
Conus granularis — Borson 1820: 196, pl. 1,
fig. 3.
Conus
(Stephanoconus) stachei nov. form.— Hoernes &
Auinger 1879: 16, pl. 6, figs 14–16.
[ Conus
granuliferus Grat. var.] drnowitzensis de Greg.— De Gregorio 1885: 376.
[ Conus
granuliferus Grat. var.] opellus de Greg. — De Gregorio 1885: 376 [nov. nom. pro Conus stachei in Hoernes & Auinger 1879, pl. 6, fig. 14].
[ Conus] H.[emiconus] granularis var. stachei (H. A.)—Sacco 1893: 123, pl. 11, fig. 37.
[ Conus
(Hemiconus) granularis var. stachei] var. druowitzensis [sic] De Greg.—Sacco
1893: 123 [nov. nom. pro Conus stachei in Hoernes & Auinger 1879, pl. 6, fig. 15].
[ Conus
(Hemiconus) granularis var. stachei] var. lissitzensis Sacc. —Sacco 1893: 123 [nov. nom. pro Conus stachei in Hoernes & Auinger 1879, pl. 6, fig. 16].
Hemiconus granularis Bors. —Friedberg 1911: 45,
pl. 2, fig. 10.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis Bors. var. stachei Hörn. u. Auin.— Meznerics
1932 /1933: 346, pl. 14, fig. 2.
Conus (Stephanoconus) stachei Hoernes et
Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 421, pl. 3, fig. 7.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis Borson—Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov
1960: 208, pl. 49, fig. 2.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis stachei Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1966: 450, pl. 66, fig. 9.
Conus (Stephanoconus) granularis stachei Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 — Hinculov 1968: 152, pl. 38,
figs 11a–b.
Conus granularis Bronn, 1820 [sic]— Zelinskaya et al. 1968:
228, pl. 51, fig. 19.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis stachei Hoernes et Auinger—Csepreghy-Mezneric
1972: 34, pl. 17, figs 23–24.
Conus granularis Borson—Pavia 1976: 157, pl. 2, fig. 12 (holotype).
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis stachei ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) — Atanacković 1985: 181,
pl. 40, figs 13–14.
Hemiconus
granularis ( Borson, 1820) — Bałuk 1997:
54, pl. 20, figs 1–4.
Conilithes
granularis ( Borson, 1820) — Kovács &
Vicián 2013: 93, fig. 160.
Revised description (3). Small shells of about 13–15 mm in length, biconical,
with moderately high conical spire and stout, ventricose last whorl; slightly
constricted at base. Protoconch high conical, comprising at least three whorls.
Early spire whorls forming a narrow, beaded upper sutural band and a
tuberculate lower part. Subsequent spire whorls consisting of two adsutural
spiral bands separated by a narrow groove; a secondary spiral cord appears
between the spiral bands on late spire whorls; upper band usually bearing small
beads. Subsutural flexure very shallow, moderately curved, nearly symmetrical.
Last whorl weakly angulated in subadult shells, rounded in adults; broad and
weak nodes appear along the shoulder in some specimens resulting in a wavy
appearance. Widely spaced pustulose spiral ridges on lower half of last whorl grading
into sharp spiral cords on ventral side. Upper half of last whorl with sharp
spiral cords, which rarely bear beads. Base faintly
constricted. Aperture straight, slightly broadening in abapical half. Fasciole
short, moderately swollen, covered with spiral threads. No colour pattern
observed.Shell
measurements and ratios. n = 13 adult specimens; largest specimen: SL: 15.2 mm,
MD: 7.9 mm, mean SL: 13.6 mm (σ = 0.8), mean MD:
7.2 (σ = 0.4), spire angle: µ = 68° (σ = 2.9°), last whorl
angle: µ = 41° (σ = 4.6°), LW: µ = 1.9 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.74 (σ = 0.04), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.05), RSH: µ = 0.29 (σ = 0.03).
Discussion
(3). This
species is synonymized with the Italian early Miocene to Pliocene Conus granularis ( Borson, 1820) (e.g. Bałuk
1997). Conus granuliferus Grateloup, 1835,
from the early Miocene of the Aquitaine Basin, was also considered a synonym of C. granularis by most authors
(e.g. Hall 1966, Lozouet et al. 2001).
The specimens from the Badenian of the Paratethys seemingly differ from
the Italian and French specimens in their mode of spire formation. Hall (1966)
and Davoli (1972) described and figured a spire sculpture consisting of two
cords separated by a deep groove. The same sculpture is seen in the somewhat
abraded holotype of Conus
granularis as illustrated in Pavia (1976) and in the
French specimen illustrated in Lozouet et al. (2001).
The Paratethyan shells, however, develop a secondary cord on the groove
separating the two main cords. Some specimens of A. granularis from the Tortonian
of Italy in the NHMW-collection, however, show a clear secondary cord as well.
Therefore, this feature seems to reflect intraspecific variability and
consequently we do not separate the Paratethyan specimens as a distinct
species.
Sacco
(1893b) placed the Italian Conus granularis Borson, 1820 in Hemiconus
Cossmann, 1889, which in our opinion is
an exclusively Eocene genus. Consequently, Friedberg (1911) and Bałuk
(1997) treated the Paratethyan species also as Hemiconus. Its type species, Hemiconus stromboides ( Lamarck, 1803),
from the Eocene of the Paris Basin, is high spired fusiform species with blunt
nodes on the spire whorls. Other species placed in Hemiconus by Cossmann &
Pissarro (1911) show a similar spire sculpture of nodes and a granulose cord
along the upper suture. These morphologies have nothing in common with the
Miocene species and therefore the placement in Hemiconus is herein rejected.
Tucker & Tenorio (2009) listed Conus granularis Borson, 1820 within Conilithes Swainson, 1840,
but the mode of spire formation in C. granularis is different from
the scalariform spire of Conilithes. Moreover, the spirally elongate beads on the last whorl of C. granularis do not occur in any Conilithes species and we
follow the recommendation by John K. Tucker (pers. comm.) to treat Conus stachei (= granularis) tentatively as Artemidiconus, despite the large geographic gap between the European
Miocene record and the extant Western Atlantic occurrence.
Artemidiconus
granularis is a moderately variable
species. Adult specimens are more ventricose than the
comparatively more slender subadult ones, which have a more pronounced shoulder.
Similarly, the sculpture of beads on the last whorl displays some variability.
This intraspecific and ontogenetic variability led de Gregorio (1885) and Sacco
(1893) to propose new variation names for each of the Conus stachei specimens
illustrated by Hoernes & Auinger (1879). Consequently, one of the three names
of de Gregorio (1885) and Sacco (1893) is an objective synonym of C. stachei and the other two
are subjective synonyms. To settle this, a lectotype of C. stachei has to be selected.
Thus, we designate the specimen illustrated as fig. 14 by Hoernes & Auinger (1879) as
lectotype of Conus stachei.
Paleoenvironment
(3).
In the
Vienna Basin, this species is found in shallow sublittoral settings partly with
sea grass meadows (e.g. Zuschin et al. 2007).
Distribution
in Paratethys (3).
Badenian (middle
Miocene): Vienna Basin: Baden, Steinebrunn, Niederleis ( Austria), Hrušovany
nad Jevišovkou, Sedlec ( Czech Republic) ( Hoernes & Auinger 1879; Sieber 1956);
Bükk Mountains: Borsodbóta ( Hungary);
Pannonian Basin:
Szob ( Hungary) (Csepreghy-Mecnerics 1956; Strausz 1966; Kovács & Vicián
2013);
Carpathian Foredeep:
Drnovice u Vyškova, Lysice ( Czech Republic), Korytnica, Małoszów,
Dryszczów ( Poland), Sboriw ( Ukraine) ( Hoernes & Auinger 1879; Zelinskaya
et al. 1968; Bałuk 1997); Transylvanian Basin: Coşteiu de Sus,
Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania) ( Hoernes & Auinger 1879; Boettger 1902);
Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: Valea Bela Reca ( Romania) ( Hinculov 1968);
Dacian Basin: Portitovci ( Bulgaria) ( Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960);
southern Pannonian Basin: Hrvaćani ( Bosnia and Herzegovina) (
Atanacković 1985).
Proto-Mediterranean Sea and north eastern Atlantic (3):
Aquitanian ( France:
Aquitaine Basin) ( Lozouet et al. 2001)
Burdigalian ( Italy:
Colli Torinesi; France Aquitaine Basin) ( Peyrot 1931; Hall 1966)
Tortonian ( Italy: Sant'Agata
Fossili, Stazzano Montegibbio) ( Davoli 1972).
|
|
|
Conus granularis (Borson, 1820) Lectotype MIGT mm.
14,8 x 7,3 Valle d’Andona(2) |
A1–A3. Artemidiconus
granularis (Borson, 1820) Lysice
(Czech Republic), NHMW 1865/0015/0004 Conus
stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 16) (= holotype of Conus
granularis lissitzensis Sacco, 1893) |
Conus
stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) (5) Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 16) (= holotype of Conus
granularis lissitzensis Sacco, 1893) |
|
||
|
Conus stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) (5) Conus granularis var. drnowitzensis (De
Gregorio, 1885) |
Conus stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) (5) Lectotype of Conus stachei (3) Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 14) (= holotype of Conus
granuliferus opellus De Gregorio, 1885) |
|
|
|
|
Conus
granularis (3) B1–B3. Artemidiconus granularis (Borson,
1820), Baden (Austria), NHMW 1999z0077/0025 Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 14) (= holotype of Conus
granuliferus opellus De Gregorio, 1885) |
from Korytnica - Holy Cross Mountains
- Poland Miocene (Badenian) [Przemysław Degórski] |
|
|
|
|
Conasprella minutissima (3) G1–G3. Conasprella minutissima nov. sp., Steinebrunn
(Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331c, paratype. H1–H3. Conasprella minutissima nov. sp., Steinebrunn
(Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331b, paratype. I1–I2. Conasprella
minutissima nov. sp., Steinebrunn
(Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331a, holotype. |
|
|
|
|
|
Conus eichwaldi (3) B1–B2. Conilithes
eichwaldi nov. nom., Zalisce (Ukraine), ZISP 62085.
C1–C2. Conilithes
eichwaldi nov. nom., Zalisce (Ukraine), ZISP 62085. |
|
|
Hemiconus granularis mm. 14,2 x 7,5 – Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-09] |
|
|
|
Conus granularis mm. 14,5 x 7,8 – Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-08] |
Conus stromboideus mm. 16,4 x 7,9 – Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-12] |
|
|
Conus
granularis (Sacco,
1893) mm. 9,8 x 5,4 Aquitaniano
– Mont de Marsan [AZFC N. 264-01] |
Conus granularis (Sacco, 1893) mm. 10,3 x 5,1 Aquitaniano – Mont de Marsan [AZFC
N. 264-02] |
|
|
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-03] |
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-04] |
|
|
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-05] |
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-06] |
|
|
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-07] |
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-08] |
|
|
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-09] |
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-10] |
|
|
Conus granularis [AZFC N. 264-11] |
|
|
|
|
|
Conus stromboideusmm. 16,4 x 7,9 Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-12] |
Conus granularis (Borson, 1820) Lectotype MIGT mm.
14,8 x 7,3 Valle d’Andona(2) |
Conus granularis mm. 14,5 x 7,8 Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-08] |
Hemiconus granularismm. 14,2 x 7,5 Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-09] |
|
|
|
|
Conus granularis (Borson 1820) mm. 11,8 x 6,3 Miocene – Aquitaniano
Saint Martin d'Oney
[AZFC N. 264-10] |
Conus granularis (Borson 1820) mm. 10,5 x 5,8 Miocene – Aquitaniano Saint Martin d'Oney [AZFC N. 264-11] |
Conus granularis (Sacco, 1893) mm. 10,3 x 5,1 Aquitaniano – Mont de Marsan [AZFC N. 264-02]
|
Conus
granularis (Sacco, 1893) mm. 9,8 x
5,4 Aquitaniano – Mont de Marsan [AZFC N.
264-01] |
|
|
|
|
Conus granuliferus (Grateloup, 1835) Conus Hemiconus granulifer (Peyrot, 1931) mm. 8,5 x 4,5 Aquitaniano – Mont de
Marsan [AZFC
N. 264-05] |
|
|
|
Bibliografia Consultata